9 years building software companies depend on

Codelogic Software Solutions LLC, a Florida company. Your agreement, invoices and liability sit with a US entity under US law, even though the engineers delivering the work are across Latin America. That distinction matters for procurement, insurance and enforcement.

The company is US-based in Orlando, Florida. Our engineers are distributed across Latin America, which puts them within roughly two hours of US business hours. That overlap is the whole point: you get same-day resolution rather than a 12-hour round trip on every question.

Since 2017. We've spent that time building and, importantly, continuing to run production software for clients across the US, Latin America and Europe, which is a different discipline from shipping projects and moving on.

Entirely. Work happens in your repositories and your cloud accounts from day one, and IP assigns to you as work is delivered and paid for. There's no stage at which we hold your system, and revoking our access is a switch you control.

We plan for it. Standard framework conventions, documented decisions, no proprietary abstractions of ours in the middle of your system. When you're ready, we document, train your team and hand over, and we'll help you write the job description.

No, and we won't compete on that. There are firms billing a fraction of our rate. What you generally buy with them is a full day of latency on every question, review overhead on your senior engineers, and rework. If the lowest hourly rate is the deciding factor, we're the wrong firm and we'd rather say so now.

Most first engagements land between $12,000 and $60,000. Below roughly $12,000 you're better served by a freelancer or an off-the-shelf tool, and we'll tell you that on the first call instead of selling you a thin engagement. A discovery is the exception, since it's worth buying on its own even if the build goes elsewhere.

Because AI compressed the part that was never the bottleneck. Generating code faster doesn't shorten deciding what the business actually needs, integrating with systems that predate the API era, migrating data whose edge cases nobody documented, or proving the new system holds the same truth as the old one before you cut over. We use AI heavily and it is precisely why work that was a nine-month project a few years ago is now eight to twenty weeks. If someone quotes you two weeks for a production system that touches money or compliance, they're quoting the demo, not the software you'll still be running next year.

There's a staging environment from week one and working software on it inside the first two weeks, then a new increment every two weeks with a 30-minute demo against it. The first release deliberately targets whichever step costs you the most hours or the most revenue, so the earliest thing you see is also the thing worth the most. You are never waiting until the end to find out whether this is going well.

Every engineer speaks fluent professional English and talks to your team directly, with no coordinator in between. We join your standups, use your Jira and your repo, and work your business hours. You'll have a weekly 30-minute demo and a written progress note.

There's a named backup already familiar with your codebase, and knowledge lives in documentation rather than one person's head. If we place someone who isn't working out, we replace them at our cost and don't bill you for the replacement's ramp-up.

IP assignment and confidentiality agreements with every engineer, enforceable through our US entity. We develop against anonymised or synthetic data rather than production records, access is provisioned by you to named individuals and revoked at close, and we can accommodate device requirements, VPN and background checks.

It's the most common arrangement. Usually your senior people own architecture and direction while our engineers add delivery capacity. We're explicitly comfortable not being in charge, and we review our own team's work internally before it reaches your reviewers.

Yes, including systems whose original developers are unreachable and systems other vendors have walked away from. It starts with a paid audit so we both understand what we're taking on, and if we don't think we can help, the audit will say so.

Yes. We're used to security questionnaires, vendor onboarding and insurance requirements. Send us your paperwork rather than asking us to impose ours.

You see budget consumed and remaining in writing every week, so nobody discovers an overrun at invoice time. On fixed-scope work we hold our price and eat our own estimation errors; the number moves only when you approve a written change order.

Yes, fully bilingual across the team, in both delivery and documentation. Useful if you have LatAm operations, Spanish-speaking staff or Spanish-language end users.